ÆÇ°á±âº»Á¤º¸
»ç°Ç¹øÈ£ 135 Cal.Rptr.3d 93
»ç°Ç¸í Maurizio R. v. L.C.
ºÐ¾ß Pacific ¼±°íÀÏÀÚ 2011-12-05
¼Ò¼Û´ë¸®ÀÎ Christopher C. Melcher£¬et al., Peter A. Lauzon£¬et al.
´ã´çÆÇ»ç JOHNSON, MALLANO, CHANEY
ÆÇ°á»ó¼¼³»¿ë
  • Maurizio R. v. L.C.


¡¼´ç»çÀÚ¡½

MAURIZIO R., Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
L.C., Defendant and Respondent.



¡¼´ë¸®ÀΡ½

Walzer & Melcher, Christopher C. Melcher and Jennifer L. Musika for Plaintiff and Appellant.


Phillips, Lerner & Lauzon, Peter A. Lauzon and Sharon Stark for Defendant Respondent.




¡¼Àü¹®¡½

JOHNSON, J.
In this action brought under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (Hague Convention), as implemented by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act, title 42 United States Code section 11601 et seq., a father appeals from a decision denying his petition for return of his young son, who was abducted by his estranged wife from Italy and brought to the United States. The trial court found that absent the satisfaction of certain conditions or ¡°undertakings,¡± return of the child to Italy unaccompanied by his mother would pose a grave risk to his psychological health. The father's petition for return was denied after he failed fully to satisfy each condition.



º» ¼­ºñ½º´Â À¯·á ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ ½ÅûÇÑ È¸¿ø¿¡°Ô¸¸ Á¦°ø
ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸½Å ȸ¿øºÐÀº ȸ¿ø °¡ÀÔ ÈÄ ÀÌ¿ëÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
·Î±×ÀÎÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸½Å ȸ¿øºÐÀº ·Î±×ÀÎ ÈÄ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
À¯·á ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ ½ÅûÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸½Å ȸ¿øºÐÀº À¯·á ¼­ºñ½º °áÁ¦¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ ·Î±×ÀÎ À¯·á¼­ºñ½º °áÁ¦ µÚ·Î°¡±â