ÆÇ°á±âº»Á¤º¸
»ç°Ç¹øÈ£ 135 Cal.Rptr.3d 545
»ç°Ç¸í Kennedy v. Eldridge
ºÐ¾ß Pacific ¼±°íÀÏÀÚ 2011-12-13
¼Ò¼Û´ë¸®ÀÎ Richard A. Eldridge
´ã´çÆÇ»ç BUTZ, DUARTE, NICHOLSON
ÆÇ°á»ó¼¼³»¿ë
  • Kennedy v. Eldridge


¡¼´ç»çÀÚ¡½

Kayla Jean KENNEDY, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Tyler Scott ELDRIDGE, Defendant and Appellant.



¡¼´ë¸®ÀΡ½

Richard A. Eldridge for Defendant and Appellant.


No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.




¡¼Àü¹®¡½

BUTZ, J.
In a roiling support and custody dispute involving an infant child, did the trial court act within its discretion in disqualifying the child's paternal grandfather from representing his son, the father, against the mother of his grandson?


We hold that it did. A plethora of family entanglements, potential misuse of confidential information, a conflict posed by the near-certain prospect that counsel will have to testify, and the preservation of the integrity of the judicial system all coalesce to support the trial court's disqualification order.




º» ¼­ºñ½º´Â À¯·á ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ ½ÅûÇÑ È¸¿ø¿¡°Ô¸¸ Á¦°ø
ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸½Å ȸ¿øºÐÀº ȸ¿ø °¡ÀÔ ÈÄ ÀÌ¿ëÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
·Î±×ÀÎÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸½Å ȸ¿øºÐÀº ·Î±×ÀÎ ÈÄ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
À¯·á ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ ½ÅûÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸½Å ȸ¿øºÐÀº À¯·á ¼­ºñ½º °áÁ¦¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ ·Î±×ÀÎ À¯·á¼­ºñ½º °áÁ¦ µÚ·Î°¡±â